Asking what a number (1) minus a non-exising value .9 repeating is meaningless. But if we assume the “infinitiness” of .9 repeating then we must also assume that taking 1 – “this” will equal some infinitely small number that is also greater than 0. This fictitious “number” would be the same as “the smallest real number that’s larger than zero”, which doesn’t exist.


An ‘infinitesimal’ is a 17th century idea that was never mathematically rigorous. 200 years later that idea was entirely replaced with the modern definition of a limit.





Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s